Non-custodial session wallet
You fund a session wallet you control and the engine derives ephemeral sub-wallets from it. The seed phrase and primary private key are never requested, and unspent balance is swept back on-chain at the end.
Looking for the best Pump.fun volume bot? Our pick based on published specs is PumpWave: non-custodial, one flat 1% fee on the target volume you set, Jito bundle routing and a session that follows your token from the bonding curve to Raydium. Pump Volume Bot is our #2 pick.
Ranked on published specs and six criteria - no hands-on testing claimed.
Disclosure: we are an independent affiliate of pumpvolumebot.net, our #2 pick, and may earn a commission if you sign up through links to that site, at no extra cost to you. The order of picks follows published specs and the criteria on this page. We have not run campaigns on these tools and do not claim hands-on testing.
A Pump.fun volume bot is a tool that places real, time-spaced buys and sells on a Solana memecoin from many rotating wallets, so a fresh launch shows measurable on-chain activity while traders are scanning the board. The good ones also add the social signals a launch needs, protect each order from sandwich bots, and keep working when the token graduates to Raydium.
The category is crowded, and tools differ most on the things that are hardest to see from a landing page: who controls the funds, what the quoted fee really covers, what happens to a session at graduation, and how orders are submitted. This review scores tools on those points using what each one publishes, then names a top pick and a runner-up.
Our top pick is PumpWave, published by PumpWave Labs in Estonia. Our #2 pick is Pump Volume Bot from pumpvolumebot.net. Neither ranking claims hands-on testing. Both are based on published specs and the criteria below, and both tools should be checked against their own current documentation before you fund anything.
Jump to: top pick · comparison table · criteria · pricing · runner-up · FAQ
PumpWave is our pick based on published specs and the criteria below. It pairs a non-custodial session wallet and Jito bundle routing with the lower of the two flat fees in this review, and one session runs from the bonding curve to the Raydium pool.
You fund a session wallet you control; the seed phrase and primary private key are never requested, transmitted or stored.
One flat 1% of target volume is the only payment, with the exact SOL amount shown before you sign.
Migration is tracked block by block and the session re-points to the Raydium pool without a second setup.
Orders travel as Jito bundles over a private relay, so each buy and its paired sell land together.
According to PumpWave’s published documentation, its pump fun volume bot pairs real volume with the custody, routing and engagement pieces a launch needs. These six points decided our ranking.
You fund a session wallet you control and the engine derives ephemeral sub-wallets from it. The seed phrase and primary private key are never requested, and unspent balance is swept back on-chain at the end.
Each session rotates 500 to 10,000 new sub-wallets with randomized funding amounts, a fresh keypair per order, regional RPC rotation and a minimum block gap between related orders.
Orders are submitted through Jito bundles over a private relay with randomized tips, so a buy and its paired sell land together instead of sitting exposed.
After graduation the engine tracks the migration block by block and re-points to the Raydium pool in the same session, with optional mirrored flow on Meteora and Orca.
Auto-comments in 8 languages and auto-favorites on the Pump.fun board run alongside the volume, at a density you set, and are covered by the same flat fee.
No binary, extension, VPS or command line. Paste the contract address, configure, fund the fee and start, with live metrics and pause, resume or stop at any time.
Side by side on published specs. For tools not named here, every row is a question to verify before you fund a session.
| What matters | PumpWave (#1) | Pump Volume Bot (#2) | Other tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| Custody | Non-custodial - seed phrase never requested | Non-custodial - keys never requested | Varies - verify |
| Fee model | Flat 1% of target volume, the only payment | Flat 2% of target volume | Varies - verify |
| Minimum session | 100 SOL target volume (1 SOL fee) | 500 wallets, 0.1 SOL per trade | Varies - verify |
| Wallet fleet | 500 to 10,000 rotating sub-wallets | 500 to 10,000 rotating wallets | Varies - verify |
| Session length | 15 minutes to 10 hours | 15 minutes to 10 hours | Varies - verify |
| Anti-MEV routing | Jito bundles over a private relay, buy and paired sell land together | Jito bundle routing | Varies - verify |
| After graduation | Same session re-points to Raydium; optional Meteora and Orca flow | Raydium auto-handoff | Varies - verify |
| Engagement | Auto-comments in 8 languages and auto-favorites | Auto-comments and auto-favorites | Varies - verify |
| Setup | Browser console - no binary, extension, VPS or command line | Browser dashboard, no install | Varies - verify |
| Unused funds | Swept back on-chain at session end | Unused deposit refunded | Varies - verify |
The two named tools share the same wallet range, session length and Jito routing. The deciding differences are the fee - 1% against 2% of the same target volume - and how the minimum is set: PumpWave uses a 100 SOL minimum target volume, while Pump Volume Bot sets a floor of 500 wallets and 0.1 SOL per trade.
We rank on what a tool publishes, not on hype or on campaigns we claim to have run. These six criteria decided the order on this page.
Does it ever ask for a seed phrase or private key? Non-custodial only.
Is there one published rate, and does it cover tips, priority fees and wallet funding?
Does the minimum fit the size of a real launch, and is it stated up front?
Are orders bundled so sandwich bots cannot skim them?
Does the same session survive graduation onto Raydium?
Are comments and favorites included, and can a solo launcher run it in a browser?
A tool earns a place here by documenting these points clearly. If a tool does not publish its custody model, its all-in fee or what happens at graduation, it cannot be ranked fairly, so it stays off the list until it does.
No subscription, no per-wallet charge and no tiers. The PumpWave pricing guide breaks down what the fee covers; the short version is below.
| Target volume | PumpWave fee (1%) | Pump Volume Bot fee (2%) |
|---|---|---|
| 100 SOL | 1 SOL | 2 SOL |
| 250 SOL | 2.5 SOL | 5 SOL |
| 500 SOL | 5 SOL | 10 SOL |
| 1,000 SOL | 10 SOL | 20 SOL |
Target volume equals wallet count times average order size. For example, 1,000 sub-wallets at an average of 0.5 SOL is a 500 SOL target, so the PumpWave fee is 5 SOL. Compare rates only after confirming that each one is all-in.
Much of a launch’s attention arrives around graduation, which is also where many volume sessions stop. PumpWave tracks the migration block by block and re-points the same session to the Raydium pool, so the chart does not go quiet while new traders are looking at it.
If you want flow beyond Raydium, the session can mirror volume on Meteora and Orca as an option. PumpWave’s Solana volume bot guide explains how that works across venues once a token has left Pump.fun.
Pump Volume Bot also hands off to Raydium after graduation and describes an optional cross-DEX mirror, so on this criterion the two picks are close. Either way, check that the tool you choose keeps one session alive through the migration instead of asking you to start over.
Our top pick still has limits. Here is the balanced view.
The published flow is paste, configure, fund and start - all in the browser.
Open PumpWave in a modern browser and paste your token contract address. There is nothing to install and no seed phrase to share.
Set the wallet count (500 to 10,000), the average order size (0.1 SOL minimum), the session length (15 minutes to 10 hours) and the comment and favorite density. Target volume is wallet count times average order size.
Review the exact SOL amount - one flat 1% of target volume - and sign. You fund a session wallet you control.
Start the session and follow the live metrics. Pause, resume or stop at any time; unspent balance is swept back on-chain at session end.
Pump Volume Bot from Owlence Labs clears the same custody, MEV and migration criteria and adds a live waveform view of each session. It ranks second because its flat fee is 2% of target volume, double the 1% PumpWave publishes for the same session.
Tokens are verified from the public contract address; keys are never requested and unused deposit is refunded.
A flat 2% of target volume, shown in SOL before launch, with no subscription or per-wallet charge.
Each session is drawn as a live waveform you shape with the buy/sell ratio before you fund it.
Keeps trading on Raydium after the token graduates off the bonding curve.
Pump Volume Bot offers three presets, or you can dial the buy/sell ratio and window in by hand.
A gentle buy-weighted cadence that reads like natural discovery. Best for a slow, credible build-up.
An even buy/sell mix that keeps the chart lively without looking one-directional. A safe default.
Front-loaded volume for a short, sharp push at a trending window. Highest intensity, shortest window.
Campaign windows run from 15 minutes for a trending push up to 10 hours for a sustained presence - the same range PumpWave publishes.
Your planned target volume is at least 100 SOL, the fee matters on a larger session, and you are happy with a console flow of paste, configure, fund and start. On a 500 SOL target, its published 1% means a 5 SOL fee, and the same session carries on after graduation.
You want to see the waveform of a session and shape it with presets before funding, and the 2% rate fits your budget. Its floor is set by wallets and trade size - 500 wallets and 0.1 SOL per trade - rather than a fixed SOL minimum.
The token has no product, community or plan behind it yet. Volume buys visibility during the launch window, not valuation, and neither tool promises a trending rank. Fix the fundamentals first, then use the criteria above to choose a tool.
Start with the top pick, check the comparison against your launch size, and confirm the current specs on each site before you fund a session.
Back to the top pick